Home Catalog Info Search View Cart Checkout Send Mail
Buy Online - Be Smart, Elegant and Unique... Buy Abaan
Online Catalogue : International News

A CHARTER OF FAITH

The first article of faith is
THOU WILT HONOUR AND FOLLOW THE THREE ETERNAL TRUTHS
  
MANASNI
Good Thoughts
HUMATA
GAVASNI
Good Words
HUKHATA
KUNUSNI
Good Deeds
HUVRASHTA

The second article of faith is

THOU WILT HONOUR AND FOLLOW THE DOCTRINE OF ASHOI, BY LIVING A GOOD AND RIGHTEOUS LIFE, REMEMBERING ALWAYS, THAT GOOD IS BEST SERVED, WHEN SERVING A FELLOW HUMAN BEING.

The third article of faith is

THOU WILT HONOUR THY WORD AND IT SHALL BE AS A BOND UNTO THEE. FORSWEARING THE LIE, FIGHTING FOR GOOD AND DESTROYING EVIL WILL BE THY LIFE'S ENDEAVOUR, FOR THE GOOD THOU WILT DO IN THIS LIFE WILL BE REWARDED IN THE ONE TO COME, AS SURELY AS EVIL WILL BE PUNISHED, TILL THE DAY OF THE FINAL RESURRECTION AND REDEMPTION FOR ALL SOULS.

The fourth article of faith is

THOU WILT HONOUR VIRTUE, FOR AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL JUDGEMENT, VIRTUE WILL BE ITS OWN REWARD AND VICE ITS OWN PUNISHMENT. KNOW FURTHER THAT THE HIGHEST VIRTUE IS VIRTUE FOR THE SAKE OF VIRTUE ALONE.

The fifth article of faith is

THOU WILT HONOUR CHARITY AND JUSTICE, AND REGARD AS VICE CRUELTY AND SLOTH.

The sixth article of faith is

THOU WILT HONOUR THE HOLY FIRE AND ALL OTHER ELEMENTS CREATED BY GOD BY NOT DEFILING THEM WITH POLLUTED MATTER.

The last article of faith is

THOU WILT HONOUR THE COVENANT MADE WITH THE LORD AT THY NAVJOTE AND FOR ALL TIMES KEEP FAITH WITH HIM.

THESE SHALL BE THE TRUTHS PREVAILING RIGHT UNTO THE END OF TIME.

Back | Top

Later Poems of Rabindranath Tagore

From " Later Poems of Rabindranath Tagore"* (Poet/Philosopher) As translated from Bengali by Aurobindo Bose

Those who in the name of Faith embrace illusion,
Kill and are killed. Even the atheist gets God's blessings - Does not boast of his religion; 

With reverence he lights the lamp of Reason And pays his homage not to scriptures, But to the good in man.

The bigot insults his own religion When he slays a man of another faith. Conduct he judges not in the light of Reason;

In the temple he raises the blood-stained banner And worships the devil in the name of God. All that is shameful and barbarous through the Ages, has found a shelter in their temples Those they turn into prisons; O, I hear the trumpet call of Destruction! Times comes with her great broom Sweeping all refuse away. That which should make man free, They turn into fetters, That which should unite, They turn into a sword; That which should bring love From the fountain of the Eternal, They turn into prison And with its waves they flood the world. They try to cross the river In a bark riddled with holes; And yet, in their anguish, whom do they blame? O Lord, breaking false religion, Save the blind! Save the blind! Break! O Break! The altar that is drowned in blood. Let your thunder strike Into the prison of false religion, And bring to this unhappy land The light of knowledge.

Nostradamus' prediction on WW3:

"In the year of the new century and nine months, From the sky will come a great King of Terror... The sky will burn at forty-five degrees. Fire approaches the great new city..." "In the city of york there will be a great collapse, 2 twin brothers torn apart by chaos while the fortress falls the great leader will succumb third big war will begin when the big city is burning"
-NOSTRADAMUS

He said this will be bigger than the previous two. 2001 is the first year of the new century and this is the 9th month. New York is located at the 41st degree Latitude.

How Poor People Live

One day a father of a very wealthy family took his son on a trip to the country with the firm purpose of showing his son how poor people live. They spent a couple of days and nights on the farm of what would be considered a very poor family. On their return from their trip, the father asked his son, "How was the trip?" "It was great, Dad." "Did you see how poor people live?" the father asked. "Oh, yeah!" said the son. "So, what did you learn from the trip?" asked the father. The son answered, "I saw that we have one dog and they had four. We have a pool that reaches to the middle of our garden and they have a creek that has no end. We have imported lanterns in our garden and they have stars at night. Our patio reaches to the front yard and they have a whole horizon. We have a small piece of land to live on and they have fields that go beyond our sight. We have servants who serve us, but they serve others. We buy our food, but they grow theirs. We have walls around our property to protect us, they have friends to protect them." With this the boy's father was speechless. Then his son added, "Thanks, dad, for showing me how poor we are." Too many times we forget what we have and concentrate on what we do not have. What is one's person's worthless object is another's prize possession. It is all based on one's perspective. Makes you wonder what would happen if we all gave thanks for all the bounty we have instead of worrying about wanting more. Take joy and appreciate everything you have, especially your friends.

Back | Top

So what are you going to do? 

When will we realise that you cannot bomb a world to freedom, asks David Edwards.
It is the defining image of our age-a 750,000 missile, packed with high technology, roars up into the darkness and away towards its target: an utterly impoverished, utterly smashed country, there to blast rubble into gravel. Just this one image, this one event in the modern world, tells us so much about ourselves.

How often have we see this before? How many times have the camera teams gathered to show those eager, angry flames tearing at the night? How often have the politicians hailed our 'Just Cause', our 'Desert Storm', our 'Enduring Freedom'? How many times have we seen the expanding spheres of light on the horizon as our bombs bubble and boil? Over and over again, constantly, always, we are bombing someone, and yet we call ourselves civilised and peaceful and humane. Has it ever worked? Have we blasted hatred away? Have we incinerated antipathy, burned it and buried it deep so that it can no longer hurt us? Is that what we've done? It all reminds me of the story told by the ancient Indian sage, Aryadeva:

'A butcher was grinding bones when a splinter got into his eye. He went to a physician who, instead of removing the splinter, gave him medicine to relieve the pain. The splinter continued to cause trouble, necessitating numerous visits to the physician who charged for each consultation. Eventually the physician left town. The butcher's son managed to remove the splinter, which finally brought lasting relief. Likewise, kings take money from the people but do not their work.'

Our bombs gives a sense of temporary relief, but the splinter of greed, of injustice, of inequality, of oppression, of horror and, so, of hatred, remains. Our 'kings' do not do their true work, the work of the butcher's son - which is to protect us by protecting everybody - they do the physician's work of protecting some and letting the rest go to hall. And the price is always high. And then they leave town. The Buddha said:

'Don't try to build your happiness on the unhappiness of others. You will be enmeshed in a net of hatred.' 

We live in a society that is so fantastically greedy, so fantastically irresponsible, that we cannot but be enmeshed in a net of hatred. Our selfishness, our indifference to the suffering of others, is simply staggering. Just consider...

First there are the business executives who subvert global warming treaties. Not only do they do it but, like John Grasser of the mining industry and the Global Climate Coalition, they admit to it and justify doing it on the grounds that they are 'buying time for our industries'. Imagine that - they are obstructing action to stop a catastrophe that will claim countless thousands, perhaps millions, of lives, for short-term profit. Is it possible to conceive of such callousness, of such selfishness raised to the level of ultimate self-destruction, of such pragmatism raised to the level of ultimate naivety?

And then there are the political and media executives who almost visibly yawned when senior UN diplomats like Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck resigned in 1998 and 2000 describing how Western sanctions were really, truly responsible for genocide in Iraq, for the deaths of 500,000 children under five.

I wrote an article based on my own interview with Halliday. In it he demolished completely, incontrovertibly, the specious denials of Washington and London. Determined to publish such obviously vital material, I rang round every liberal newspaper in England, Ireland and Scotland. I was offering the arguments of an entirely credible high-level diplomat accusing my government of genocide. The article was dismissed out of hand, or because 'Halliday is old hat', or because 'the question and answer format is not right for us', or because 'what is needed is for the Government position to change first', or because 'we have already covered that subject' in an article before, once. The indifference and cynicism were breathtaking - they gave me a snapshot of a society utterly lost to self-interest and servility to power.

And now thousands of people lie crushed to death beneath giant buildings, and B52s are pounding a country packed with starving people. And my government, my media - this establishment, whose irresponsibility and cynicism I have personally witnessed - are telling me that 'we' are at war with evil. But they themselves are so befuddled by arrogance and compromise that they can't see the joke -that you can't wage war on evil with missiles and bombs. You can't hate someone else's hatred away.

You can wage war on evil with compassion for the suffering that causes evil, on the greed that creates the conditions on which evil thrives. You can wage war on evil by demolishing your own fatal arrogance, which, alas and alack!, makes you honestly, truly and sincerely believe that you - in your skin, in your clothes, in your car, in your job - are really more important, more special, dammit more human, than that person over there in his skin, clothes and job.

There is only one evil - it is the evil of me just caring for me and mine, and not caring a damn for him and his. To wage war on evil we have to wage war on this terrible delusion: that only we matter, that we can best protect ourselves by caring only for ourselves. Bring the madmen to justice, but then turn things around for the rest of them: care for him and his, because I tell you we have not up to now, not for a moment. But how do you do that when your whole political system, your entire economic system, your entire cultural system, is designed to take from him and to give to an opulent few?

The answer is simple: there are no systems, not really; there are only human hearts. So what are you going to do?

Back | Top

Mind, Not Muscle Can Fight Terror
By Swami Satya Vedant 

Terrorism is not new, though it has come in a new incarnation. Historically the Huns, Timur Lane, Nadir Shah, Mahmood Gaznavi, Hitler, Stalin and Mao are all part of a chain of terrorists down to Osama bin Laden and his gang, the Al-Qaida.

Many may perceive the British as terrorists citing the gory incident of Jallianwala Bagh. The major difference is, now the phenomenon of terrorism is no longer limited to a particular area or a geographical territory. It has become globalised.

Everybody is the world now feels threatened and terrorised. It seems, psychologically, people have carried the feeling of terror within- Osama and company have only magnified it on a global scale. 

Terrorism is the result of entrapment of soul in ideology. Any ideology, whether religious, political, or social, when it becomes a closed system, turns harmful. A new idea is an open invitation to reflect, to search and to experiment.

However, when an ideology is woven around it fanaticism and rigidity begin to strangle society. While an idea represents a free expression of thought, ideology is imposed to serve vested interests. In the imposition of an ideology the individual is not the concern, the system, the pattern and the conditioned view is the central force. Ideology when forced brings violence and violence is used to justify the correctness of an ideology.

Terrorism is an ideological violence essentially rooted in unconscious human behaviour. It shows its heinous form when governed by hypnotic conditioning. Osho points out, "Terrorism is not in the bombs in your hand, terrorism is in your unconscious". Religion in most cases has proven marx right for functioning as an "opium" and has consequently rained terror on men, woman and children. Ironically, more often than not religion has taken God for a ride and has sold ideology around it with force, often brutal.

Existing nuclear and biological weapons have placed humanity at grave risk. How does one keep human life free from terrorism? The first need obviously is to get out of the trap of dogmatic, closed and blind following of religion. But along with that we will have to be vigilant and pro-active, speak out against the regimented conditioning imposed by the custodians of "religion". We will need to bring more celebration in our life - more joy, more laughter. A happy person can never become a terrorist. We will have to move from 'Gun Culture' to 'Fun Culture'. Life is not a problem to be solved by violent means, it is needed a gift to be shared by living joyously. Osho has said, "Wisdom is a very relaxed state of being. Wisdom is not knowledge, not information; wisdom is your inner being awake, alert, watchful, witnessing, full of light. Be full of light - it is your birthright".

What we need in essence is a commitment to making this world for our future generation a better place to live and enjoy. First, we need to make a conscious commitment to be free of all conditioning, patterns of belief and behaviour, trappings of de-humanising of de-humanising ideologies. Further, we need to help our children remain free from all that breeds hatred, violence, prejudice, aggression. We need to help them develop the quality of what Osho calls "religiousness" rather than having them follow religion blindly. He said, "Don't waste time. Time is really precious, for more precious than money, far more precious than anything in the world, because it is through time that you can contact eternity".

What we need is a vision that would raise our consciousness higher so that we may take care of our lower instincts of hate and violence, greed and power. The sages remind us: bhumaiva sukham, naalpe sukhamasti or true happiness is in growing, expanding our consciousness, there is no happiness in being narrow and fragmented. Under prevailing conditions, the greatest challenge before us is to heal our mind and body. We are a wounded civilisation.

We need to go back to the basis: awereness, understanding and meditation. It is time mankind matures into being truly human. The maxim, " survival of the fittest" is no longer valid and is not capable of meeting the evolving pluralistic, democratic aspirations of mankind today. We have no choice but to grow into realising what Jonas Salk says, "servival of the wisest". We have to dig into our unconscious, in removing debris of the past because something very precious is buried under. We can find it. It is our birthright.

(The author is chancellor, Osho Multiversity, Osho international Foundation, Pune)

Back | Top

Test yourself know yourself

Hey Folks,
Try this out. Really good! Don't cheat if you want to know to know yourself!! Take this test for yourself...and send it to your friends, including me, and let them know who you are. It takes about 5 minutes. My score is in the subject box. Don't peek but begin the test as you scroll down and answer. Answers are for who you are now...not who you were in the past. Have a pen or pencil and paper ready. This is a real test given by the Human Relations Depts at many major corporations today. It helps them get a better insight concerning their employees and potential employees.

It's only 10 simple questions, so...grab a pencil and paper, and keep track of your letter answers.

  1. When do you feel your best?
    (a) in the morning
    (b) during the afternoon & early evening
    (c) late at night

  2. You usually walk
    (a) fairly fast, with long steps
    (b) fairly fast, with short, quick steps
    (c) less fast head up, looking the world in the face
    (d) less fast, head down
    (e) very slowly

  3. When talking to people you
    (a) stand with your arms folded
    (b) have your hands clasped
    (c) have one or both your hands on your hips
    (d) touch or push the person to whom you are talking
    (e) play with your ear, touch your chin, or smooth your hair

  4. When relaxing, you sit
    (a) your knees bent with your legs neatly side by side
    (b) your legs crossed
    (c) your legs stretched out or straight
    (d) one leg curled under you

  5. When something really amused you, you react with
    (a) a big, appreciative laugh
    (b) a laugh, but not a loud one
    (c) a quiet chuckle
    (d) a sheepish smile

  6. When you go to a party or social gathering you
    (a) make a loud entrance so everyone notices you
    (b) make a quiet entrance, looking around for someone you know
    (c) make the quietest entrance, trying to stay unnoticed

  7. You're working very hard, concentrating hard, and you're interrupted. Do you...
    (a) welcome the break
    (b) feel extremely irritated
    (c) vary between these two extremes

  8. Which of the following colors do you like most?
    (a) red or orange
    (b) black
    (c) yellow or light blue
    (d) green
    (e) dark blue or purple
    (f) white
    (g) brown or grey

  9. When you are in bed at night, in those last few, moments before going to sleep, you lie
    (a) stretched out on your back
    (b) stretched out face down on your stomach
    (c) on your side, slightly curled
    (d) with your head on one arm
    (e) with your head under the overs

  10. You often dream that you are
    (a) falling
    (b) fighting or struggling
    (c) searching for something or somebody
    (d) flying or floating
    (e) you usually have dreamless sleep
    (f) your dreams are always pleasant

POINTS :

  1. (a) 2  (b) 4 (c) 6

  2. (a) 6 (b) 4 (c) 7 (d) 2 (e) 1

  3. (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) 5 (d) 7 (e) 6

  4. (a) 4 (b) 6 (c) 2 (d) 1

  5. (a) 6 (b) 4 (c) 3 (d) 5 (e) 2

  6. (a) 6 (b) 4 (c) 2

  7. (a) 6 (b) 2 (c) 4

  8. (a) 6 (b) 7 (c) 5 (d) 4 (e) 3 (f) 2 (g) 1

  9. (a) 7 (b) 6 (c) 4 (d) 2 (e) 1

  10. (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) 3 (d) 5 (e) 6 (f) 1

Now add up the total number of points.

OVER 60 POINTS : Others see you as someone they should handle with care. You're seen as vain, self-centered, and who is extremely dominant. Others may admire you, wishing they could be more like you, but don't always trust you, hesitating to become too deeply involved with you.

51 to 60 POINT : Others see you as an exciting, highly volatile, rather impulsive personality; a naturally leader, who's quick to make decisions, though not always the right ones. They see you as bold and adventuresome, someone who will try anything once; someone who takes chances and enjoys an adventure. They enjoy being in your company because of the excitement you radiate.

41 to 50 POINTS : Others see you as fresh, lively, charming, amusing, practical, and always interesting; someone who's constantly in the center of attention, but sufficiently well-balanced not to let it go to their head. They also see you as kind, considerate, and understanding; someone who'll always cheer them up and help them out.

31 TO 40 POINTS : Other see you as sensible, cautious, careful, and practical. They see you as clever, gifted, or talented, but modest. not a person who makes friends too quickly or easily, but someone who's extremely loyal to friends you do make and who expect the same loyalty in return. Those who really get to know you realize it takes a lot to shake your trust in your friends, but equally that it takes you a long time to get over it if that trust is ever broken

21 - 30 POINTS : Your friends see you as painstaking and fussy. They see you as very cautious, extremely careful, a slow and steady plodder. It'd really surprise them if you ever did something impulsive or on the spur of the moment, expecting you to examine everything carefully from every angle and then usually decide against it. They think this reaction is caused partly by your careful nature.

UNDER 21 POINTS : People think you are shy, nervous, and indecisive, someone who needs looking after, who always wants someone else to make the decisions and who doesn't want to get involved with anyone or anything. They see you as a worrier who always sees problems that don't exist. Some people think you're boring. Only those who know you well know that you aren't.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and if protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

Back | Top
Life & Learning

I've learned.... that the best classroom in the world is at the feet of an elderly person. 
I've learned.... that when you're in love, it shows.
I've learned.... that just one person saying to me, "You've made my day!" makes my day.
I've learned.... that having a child fall asleep in your arms is one of the most peaceful feelings in the world.
I've learned.... that being kind is more important than being right.
I've learned.... that you should never say not to a gift from a child.
I've learned.... that I can always pray for someone when I don't have the strength to help him in some other way.
I've learned.... that no matter how serious your life requires you to be, everyone needs a friend to act goofy with.
I've learned.... that sometimes all a person needs is a hand to hold and a heart to understand.
I've learned.... that simple walks with my father around the block on summer nights when I was a child did wonders for me as an adult.
I've learned.... that life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes.
I've learned.... that we should be glad God doesn't give us everything we ask for.
I've learned.... that money doesn't buy class.
I've learned.... that it's those small daily happenings that make life so spectacular.
I've learned.... that the Lord didn't do it all in one day. What makes me think I can?
I've learned.... that to ignore the facts does not change the facts.
I've learned.... that when you plan to get even with someone, you are only letting that person continue to hurt you.
I've learned.... that love, not time, heals all wounds.
I've learned.... that the easiest way for me to grow as a person is to surround myself with people smarter than I am.
I've learned.... that everyone you meet deserves to be greeted with a smile.
I've learned.... that there's nothing sweeter than sleeping with your babies and feeling their breath on your cheeks.
I've learned.... that no one is perfect until you fall in love with them.
I've learned.... that life is tough, but I'm tougher.
I've learned.... that opportunities are never lost; someone will take the ones you miss.
I've learned.... that when you harbor bitterness, happiness will dock elsewhere.
I've learned.... that I wish I could have told my Mom that I love her one more time before she passed away.
I've learned.... that one should keep his words both soft and tender, because tomorrow he may have to eat them.
I've learned.... that a smile is an in expensive way to improve your looks.
I've learned.... that I can't choose how I feel, but I can choose what I do about it.
I've learned.... that when your newly born grandchild holds your little finger in his little fist, that you're hooked for life.
I've learned.... that everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it.
I've learned.... that it is best to give advice in only two circumstances; when it is requested and when it is a life-threatening situation.
I've learned.... that the less time I have to work with, the more things I get done.................!!!

Back | Top

India - Cradle of the human race

Interesting facts about India and Indians!
Something to be proud about !!
There are 3.22 Million Indians in America
38% of Doctors in America are Indians.
12% of Scientists in America are Indian.
36% of NASA employees are Indians.
34% of MICROSOFT employees are Indians.
28% of IBM employees are Indians.
17% of INTEL employees are Indians.
13% of XEROX employees are Indians.


FACTS ABOUT INDIA

  1. India never invaded any country in her last 10000 years of history.

  2. India invented the Number System. Zero was invented by Aryabhatta.

  3. The World's first university was established in Takshila in 700BC. More than 10,500 students from all over studied more than 60 subjects. The University of Nalanda built in the 4th century BC was one of the greatest achievements of ancient India in the field of education.

  4. Sanskrit is the mother of all languages.

  5. Ayurveda is the earliest school of medicine known to humans. Charaka, the father of medicine consolidated Ayurveda 2500 years ago. Today Ayurveda is fast regaining its rightful place in our civilization.

  6. Although modern images of India often show poverty and lack of development, India was the richest country on earth until the time of British invasion in the early 17th Century.

  7. The art of Navigation was born in the river Sindh 6000 years ago. The very word Navigation is derived from the Sanskrit word NAVGATIH. The word navy is also derived from Sanskrit "Nou'.
    h.. Bhaskaracharya calculated the time taken by the earth to orbit the sun hundreds of years before the astronomer Smart. Time taken by the earth to orbit the sun: (5th century) 365.258756484 days.

  8. The value of "pi" was first calculated by Budhayana, and he explained the concept of what is known as the Pythagorean Theorem. He discovered this in the 6th century long before the European mathematicians.

  9. Algebra, trigonometry and calculus came from India. Quadratic equations were by Sridharacharya in the 11th century. The largest numbers the Greeks and the Romans used where as Hindus used numbers as big as 1053 ( 10 to the power of 53) with specific names as early as 5000 BCE during Vedic period. Even today, the largest used number is Tera 1012 (10 to the power of 12)

  10. According to the Gemological Institute of America, up until 1896, India was the only source for diamonds to the world.

  11. USA based IEEE has proved what has been a century old suspicion in the world scientific community that the pioneer of wireless communication was Prof. Jagdeesh Bose and not Marconi.

  12. The earliest reservoir and dam for irrigation was built in Saurashtra.

  13. According to Saka King Rudradam I of 150 CE a beautiful lake called 'Sudarshana' was constructed on the hills of Raivataka during Chandragupta Maurya's time.

  14. Chess (Shatranja or AshtaPada) was invented in India.

  15. Sushruta is the father of surgery. 2600 years ago he and heaith scientists of his time conducted complicated surgerries like cesareans, cataract, artifical limbs, fractures, urinary stoners and even plastic surgery and brain surgery. Usage of anesthesia was well known in ancient India. Over 125 surgical equipment were used. Deep knowledge of anatomy, physiology, etiology, mbryology, digestion, metabolism,genetics and immunity is also found in many texts.

  16. When many cultures were only nomadic forest dwellers over 5000 years ago, Indians established Harappan culture in Sindhu valley (Indus Valley Civilization.. The placevalue system, the decimal system was developed in India in 100 BC.

QUOTES ABOUT INDIA

  1. Albert Einstein said: We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made.

  2. Mark Twain said: India is, the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend, and the great grand mother of tradition. Our most valuable and most structive materials in the history of man are treasured up in India only.

  3. French scholar Roman Rolland said: If there is one place on the face of earth where all the dreams of living men have found a home from the very earliest days when man began the dream of existence, it is India.

  4. Hu Shih, former Ambassador of China to USA said: India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border..
      
    Believe it or not!!

Back | Top

How the CIA & NSA help American firms win contracts

Documents obtained by the Independent on Sunday reveal how the CIA and NSA (US National Security Agency) have immersed themselves in the new hot trade war. Targets have included UK and European firms. At stake are contracts worth billions of dollars.

For America's spies, an important tool has been the global eavesdropping system known by the code name Echelon is part of a British/American-run worldwide spy system that can "suck up" phone calls, faxes and e-mails sent by satellite. America's intelligence agencies have been able to intercept these vital private communications, often between foreign governments and European businesses, to help the US win major contracts

Britain's role in Echelon, via its ultra-secret eavesdropping agency GCHQ has put Tony Blair's government in the dock facing its European partners. European politicians meet on Wednesday in Strasbourg and Berlin to call for inquiries into electronic espionge by the US to beat competitors. These debates follow two years of controversy about Echelon, as its astonishing power has gradually been revealed.

But the real origin of the current row lies in the early 1990s, when US politicians and intelligence chiefs decided that the formidable but underemployed Cold War US intelligence apparatus should be redirected against its allies' economies. At stake was not just routine international trade, but new opportunities created by the demise of communism and fast-growing markets in countries that US trade officials dubbed "BEMs"-Big Emerging Markets such as China, Brazil and Indonesia.

Perhaps the most starting result of the new Clinton policy came in January 1994, when the then French Prime Minister Edouard Balladur flew to Riyadh to conclude a US$6-billion deal for arms, airliners and maintenance, including sales of the European Airbus. He flew home empty-handed. The Baltimore Sun later reported that "from a commercial communications satellite, NSA lifted all the faxes and phone calls between the European consortium Airbus, the Saudi national airline and the Saudi government intervened with the Saudis and the contract went to Boeing.

This is just one of hundreds of "success" stories openly boasted by the US Government's "Advocacy Center" up to the present day. They do not say where the CIA or NSA was decisive in winning a contract, but often brag of beating British, European or Japanese competitors.

Cases where the US "beat" British competitors include power generation, engineering and telecommunications contracts in the Philippines, Malawi, Peru, Tunisia and Lebanon. In India, the CIA tracked British competitive strategies in a competition to built a 700MW power station near Bombay. In January 1995, the $40-million contract was awarded to the US companies Enron, GE and Bechtel. Also in 1995, General Electric Power Systems won a $120 million tender to build a plant in Tunisia. "They beat intense competition from French, German, Italian and British firms for the project, "the Center boasts.

Documents and information obtained by the Independent on Sunday show that the critical question of whether US intelligence should systematically help business was resolved after the election of Clinton in 1993, when he launched a policy "to aggressively support US bidders in global competitions where advocacy is in the national interest".

The SIGINT (signals intelligence) reports obtained by the Independent on Sunday are economic in nature. All the reports are classified "TOP SECRET UMBRA". indicating that highly-sensitive monitoring techniques were used to get the information.

The heart of the new, co-ordinated Clinton trade campaign is the Advocacy Center, run by the Trade Promotion Co-ordinating Committee within the Department of Commerce. Declassified minutes of the Trade Promotion Co-ordinating Committee meetings from 1994 show that the CIA's role in drumming up business for the US was not limited to looking for bribery or even lobbying by foreign governments. For a series of meetings dealing with Indonesia, 16 officials were circulated with information. Five of the officials were from the CIA; three of the five worked inside the Commerce Department itself, in a department called the Office of Executive Support, and the fifth, Robert Beamer, was from CIA headquarters.

In really, the Office of Executive Support, is a high-security office located inside the Commerce Department. It is staffed by CIA officials with top-secret security clearances and equipped with direct links from US intelligence agencies. Until recently, it was known (more revealingly) as the Office of Intelligence Liaison.

According to Loch K. Johnson, a staff member of the US Intelligence Reform Commission set up in 1993, officials at the departments of Commerce. Treasury and State pass information to US companies without revealing the intelligence source. "At Commerce there's no code or book to consult to say when and what information can be passed to a US company", he said.

(Source : By Duncan Compbell and Paul Lashmar, Independent on Sunday, 3 July 2000, www.independent.co.uk/news/)

Back | Top

Free Press & Media in USA

John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff of the New York Times, called by his peers "the Dean of his profession", was asked to give a toast before the New York Press Club. He responded with the following statement:
There is no such thing as an independent press in America. If we except that of little country towns. You know this and I know it. Not a man among you dares to utter his honest opinion. Were you to utter it, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print.

I am paid so that I may keep my honest opinion out of the newspaper for which I write. You, too, are paid similar salaries for similar services. Were I to permit that a single edition of my newspaper contained an honest opinion, my occupation - like Othello's - would be gone in less than twenty-four hours. The man who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinion would soon be on the streets in search of another job.

It is the duty of a New York journalist to lie, to distort, to revile, to toady at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread-or, what amounts to the same thing, his salary.

We are the tools and the vassals of the rich behind the scenes. We are marionettes. These men pull the strings and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our capacities are all the property of these men. We are intellectual prostitutes.

It is the mass media of America today. Press control and, later, electronic media (radio and TV) control were seized in carefully planned steps, yielding the present situation in which all major mass media and the critically important major reporting services, which are the source of most news stories, are controlled by the Money Changeres.

The J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding and powder interests and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States, and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press…

They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers… An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.

A few years ago, three-quarters of the majority stockholders of ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN were banks - such as Chase Manhattan Corp., Citibank, Morgan Guaranty Trust and Bank of America. Ten such corporations controlled 59 magazines (including Time and Newsweek), 58 newspapers (including the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal), and various motion-picture companies, giving the major Wall Street banks virtually total ownership of the mass media with few exceptions (such as Disney's purchase of ABC).

Only 50 cities in America now have more than one daily paper, and they are often owned by the same group. Only about 25 per cent of the nation's 1,500 daily papers are independently owned. This concentration has been rapidly accelerating in recent years and ownership is nearly monolithic now, reflecting the identical control described above. Of course, much care is taken to fool the public with the appearance of competition by maintaining different corporate logos, anchorpersons and other trivia, projecting a sense of objectivity that belies the uniform underlying back ownership and editorial control. This accounts of the total blackout on news coverage and investigative reporting on banker control of the country.

Back | Top

HISTORY - GENOCIDE - SLAVERY - THE TRUTH ??

Every year, the US population celebrates Columbus Day. Yet Columbus was a mass-murderer, whose soldiers killed thousands of American Indians, and whose legacy was a continent-wide genocide against the original inhabitants of the Americas. So what does the celebrating of Columbus Day tell us about modern America? By Peter Montague

Examining a nation's heroes may tell us something fundamental about that nation's goals and values. Christopher Columbus has been a genuine American hero since at least 1792, when the Society of St. Tammany in New York City first held a dinner to honour the man and his deeds.

From numerous of his letters and reports, we learn that his overarching goal was to seize wealth that belonged to others - even his own men - by whatever means necessary.

Columbus then installed himself as Governor of the Caribbean islands, with headquarters on Hispaniola (the large island now shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic). He described the People, the Arawaks (called by some the Tainos) this way:

"The people of this island and of all the other islands which I have found and seen, or have not seen, all go naked, men and women, as their mothers bore them, except that some women cover one place only with the leaf of a plant or with a net of cotton which they make for that purpose. They have no iron or steel or weapons, nor are they capable of using them, although they are well-built people of handsome stature, because they are wondrous timid... They are so artless and free with all they possess, that no one would believe it without having seen it, they never say no; rather they invite the person to share it, and show as much love as if they were giving their hearts; and whether the thing be of value or of small price, at once they are content with whatever little thing of whatever kind may be given to them." 

After Columbus had surveyed the Caribbean region, he returned to Spain to prepare for an invasion of the Americas. From accounts of his second voyage, we can begin to understand what the New World represented to Columbus and his men - it offered them life without limits - unbridled freedom. Columbus took the title 'Admiral of the Ocean Sea' and proceeded to unleash a reign of terror unlike anything seen before or since. When he was finished, eight million Arawaks - virtually the entire native population of Hispaniola - had been exterminated by torture, murder, forced labour, starvation, disease and despair.

A Spanish missionary, Bartolome de las Casas, described first-hand how the Spaniards terrorised the natives. Las Casas gives numerous eyewitness accounts of repeated mass murder and routine sadistic torture. As Barry Lopez has accurately summarised it, "One day, in front of las Casas, the Spanish dismembered, beheaded, or raped 3,000 people. 'Such inhumanities and barbarisms were committed in my sight,' he says, 'as no age can parallel... 'The Spanish cut off the legs of children who ran away from them. They killed people by pouring boiling soap down their throats. They made bets as to who, with one sweep of his sword, could cut a person in half. They loosed dogs that 'devoured an Indian like a hog, at first sight, in less than a moment.' They used nursing infants for dog food." This was not occasional violence - it was a systematic, prolonged campaign of brutality and sadism, a policy of torture, mass murder, slavery and forced labour that continued for centuries. "The destruction of the Indians of the Americas was, far and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world," writes historian David E. Stannard.8 Eventually more than 100 million natives fell under European rule. Their extermination would follow. As the natives died out, they were replaced by slaves brought from Africa.

To cut a long and very grisly story short, Columbus established a pattern that held for five centuries - a "ruthless, angry search for wealth", as Barry Lopez describes it. "It set a tone in the Americas. The quest for personal possessions was to be, from the outset, a serious of raids, irresponsible and criminal, a spree, in which an end to it - the slaves, the timber, the pearls, the fur, the precious ores, and later, arable land, coal, oil and iron ore - was never visible, in which an end to it had to meaning." Indeed, there was no end to it, no limit.

The British arrived in Jamestown in 1607. By 1610, the intentional extermination of the native population was well along. As David E. Stannard has written, "Hundreds of Indians were killed in skirmish after skirmish. Other hundreds were killed in successful plots of mass poisoning. They were hunted down by dogs, 'blood-hounds to draw after them, and Mastives [mastiffs] to seaze them.' Their canoes and fishing weirs were smashed their villages and agricultural fields burned to the ground. Indians peace offers were accepted by the English only until their prisoners were returned; then , having lulled the natives into false security, the colonists returned to the attack. It was the colonists' expressed desire that Indians be exterminated, rooted 'out from being longer a people upon the face of the earth.' In a single raid, the settlers destroyed corn sufficient to feed four thousand people for a year. Starvation and the massacre of non-combatants was becoming the preferred British approach to dealing with the natives."12

In Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Jersey extermination was officially promoted by a "scalp bounty" on dead Indians. "Indeed, in many areas it [murdering Indians ] became an outright business," writes historian Ward Churchill.13

Indians were defined as sub-humans, lower than animals. George Washington compared them to wolves, "beats of pery", and called for their total destruction.14 Andrew Jackson - whose portrait appears on the US $20 bill today - in 1814 "supervised the mutilation of 800 or more Cree Indians corpses the bodies of men, women and children that [his troops] had massacred - cutting off their noses to count and preserve a record of the dead, slicing long strips of flesh from their bodies to tan and turn into bridle reins."15

The English policy of extermination - another name for genocidene - grew more insistent as settlers pushed westward. In 1851 the Governor of California officially called for the extermination of the Indians in his state.16 On March 14, 1863 the Rocky Mountain News in Denver ran an editorial titled, 'Exterminate Them.' On April 2, 1863 the Santa Fe New Mexican advocated "extermination of the Indians".17 In 1867 General William Tecumesh Sherman said, "We Must act with vindictive earnestness against the Lakotas [known to whites as the Sioux], even to their extermination, men, women and children."18

In 1891, Frank L. Baum (gentle author of The Wizard of Oz) wrote in the Aberdeen (Kansas) Saturday Pioneer that the army should "finish the job" by the total annihilation" of the few remaining Indians. The US did not follow through on Baum's macabre demand, however, for there really was no need. By then, the native population had been reduced to 2.5 per cent of its original numbers, and 97.5 per cent of the aboriginal land base had been expropriated and renamed the land of the free and the home of the brave. Hundred upon hundred of native tribes with unique languages, learning, customs and cultures had simply been erased from the face of the Earth, most often without even the pretence of justice or law.

Today we can see the remnant cultural arrogance of Christopher Columbus and Captain John Smith shadowed in the cult of the 'global free market' which aims to eradicate indigatious cultures and traditions worldwide, to force all peoples to adopt the ways of the US. Global free trade is manifest destiny writ large.

But as Barry Lopez says, "This violent corruption needn't define us... We can say - yes, this happened, and we are ashamed. We repudiate the greed. We recognise and condemn the evil. And we see how the harm has been perpetuated. But, five hundred years later, we could set limits on overselves for once. We could declare enough is enough. So it is always good to remember Columbus on his day, and to consider his legacy.

Back | Top

Empires without armies

The model of 'development' which has been foisted upon the 'Third World' for the last fifty years is strikingly similar, in both aims and outcomes, to the Imperial colonialism which preceded it. The aim of 'development' is not to improve the lives of lives of Third World citizens, labour and raw materials for big corporations. Global Development is Imperialism without the need for military conquest. By Edward Goldsmith

The word 'development' was first used in its contemporary context by American President, Harry Truman, who in 1949 referred to the poor nations of the South as 'underdeveloped areas.' While the vocabulary may have been new, the assumptions behind it were not. As the French banker-turned-critic of development Francois Partant put it in 1982:

"The developed nations have discovered for themselves a new mission-to help the Third World advance along the road to development... which is nothing more than the road on which the West has guided the rest of humanity for several centuries."1

Partant was right. An examination of the situation in the Third World today reveals a disturbing continuity between the colonial era and the era of development. Patterns of land-use, government, and even national frontiers, imposed by European empires in the nineteenth century, have been largely maintained, with few attempts to revert to pre-colonial traditions, structures or paradigms. What Marxists refer to as "imperialism" and what Western governments today call "development" amount to much the same thing.

Same goals, Same Aim
If development and colonialism (at least in its last phase, from the 1870s onwards) are the same process under different names, it is largely because they share the same goal. That goal was explicitly stated in the 1890s by one of Britain's most successful colonialists, Cecil Rhodes:

"We must find new lands from which we can easily obtain raw materials and at the same time exploit the cheap slave labour that is available from the natives of the colonies. The colonies would also provide a dumping ground for the surplus goods produced in our factories."

Perhaps unsurprisingly, many countries, particularly in Asia, were not willing to let themselves be exploited in this way. But those who resisted were eventually bullied, either economically or militarily, into complying with Western demands. Two wars had to be fought with the Chinese before they would open their ports to British trade, and only the threat of an American naval bombardment of japan persuaded it to open its markets to the West. By 1880, European powers had obtained access to the markets of most of Asia's coastal regions. Still though, commercial interests continued to demand ever more favourable conditions for European corporations. 

Eventually, in China, as Harry Magdoff notes, Western activities largely "escaped China's laws and tax collections. Foreign settlements had their own police forces and tax systems, and ran their own affairs independently of a nominally sovereign China" -a situation not far removed from that which exists today in the Third World's Free Trade Zones. "At the same time, the opium trade, which had been forced on the Chinese government militarily, was legalised, customs duties reduced, foreign gunboats patrolled China's rivers and foreigners were placed on customs-collection staffs to ensure that China would pay the indemnities imposed by various treaties."

The Gospel of 'Free Trade'
Formal colonisation came to an end, then, not because colonial powers decided to generously grant freedom to their imperial subjects, but because the economic advantages of colonisation could now be provided more effectively by cheaper methods. This was clear to the foreign policy professionals and heads of large corporations who began meeting in Washington in 1939 under the aegis of the US Council on Foreign Relation's to discuss how to shape the post-war economy in their own interests.

Beads and Trinkets 
The most effective means of ensuring a lasting colonisation of Third World countries is to set up a Westernised elite, hooked on a model of economic development which it is willing to promote regardless of the interests of the majority of its citizens. This has now been widely achieved, and the political/economic elites in many 'developing countries are today effectively agents of the West.

The need to create such an elite was well-known to the colonial powers too. During the British debate after the 1857 Indian mutiny, the main question at issue was whether an Anglicised elite favourable to British commercial interests could be created in time to prevent further uprisings. If not, it was generally conceded, formal occupation would have to be maintained indefinitely.

If an elite is to impose an alien model of economic development onto a population, it must be suitably armed, and today this is one of the main aims of the West's so-called 'aid' programmes. Recent years have been countless examples of aid programmes tied to 'development' projects and to arms sales, and two-thirds of US aid to 'developing' countries takes the from of "security assistance". Most of the governments that have received security aid from the US in recent decades are military dictatorships such as those in Chile, Nicaragua, Argentina, Uruguay, Peru and Indonesia. They faced no external threats; it was not to defend themselves against a foreign invader that the security aid was needed, but rather to impose development onto a restless population which had already been impoverished by it.

Dealing with Mutineers
When a government unfavourable to Western interests succeeds in coming to power in the South, Western governments will go to any ends to remove it, as recent history has shown again and again. One of the most telling examples comes from the 1960s, when the US organised the military overthrow of the Brazilian government of Jose Goulart. Goulart had sought to impose a limit on the amount of money foreign corporations could take out of the country. Worse still, he had organised a land reform programme which meant taking back control of the country's mineral resources from Western transnational corporations, and had given workers a pay rise, in defiance of International Monetary Fund orders. It did not take long for all US aid to be cut off, and for an alliance of the CIA, Us investors and Brazil's landowning elite to organise a coup and install a military junta, which overturned Goulart's reforms.

Killing the Domestic Economy
In order to provide a significant market for their products, it was necessary for colonial powers to kill the domestic economies of the countries they colonised. The favourite method was to tax whatever it was the colonials particularly liked to consume, as there was no way locals could meet their tax obligations without working in the mines and plantations, or growing cash crops for their colonial masters.

At the same time, every effort was made to destroy indigenous crafts. So, for example, the British deliberately set about destroying the Indian textile industry, which had been the very lifeblood of the village economy. And in French West Africa in 1905, levies were imposed on all goods which did not come from France or its empire, pushing up the prices of local goods and ruining local artisans and traders.

"The liberty of democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than that of the state itself. That, in essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power." - Franklin D. Roosevelt, Quoted in the Corporate Crime Reporter.

Lending Money
In order for the compliant elite of a Third World nation to be able to create the conditions for development, a large amount of funding is needed. For the West, lending money to those elites is the most effective means of ensuring that Third World development carries on along the 'right' lines.

If the government is to be capable of repaying the money it has borrowed from the West, or from one of its institutional creations such as the World Bank or IME, the money must be invested in enterprises that are competitive on the international market, for interest payments must be paid in foreign exchange, usually US dollars. Unfortunately, this is unlikely to occur: in many borrower nations, anything up to 20 per cent of the money will be skimmed off in the form of kickbacks to politicians and officials, and much of the rest will be spent on useless consumer products, mainly luxury goods for the elite. More will be spent on vast infrastructure projects which will not generate a return for a very long time, if at all, and on armaments to put down any uprisings caused by development. The result is that Third World countries which borrow from the West almost always fall into unrepayable debt. 

Once in debt, they become hooked on further and further borrowing, thus falling under the power of the lending countries. At this point the latter, through the IMF, can institutionalise their control over a debtor country by Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) which in effect take over its economy to ensure that interest payments are regularly met. Result: borrowing countries become de facto colonies of the West.

"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude." -Aldous Huxley

Back | Top
Small Is Bountiful

For more than a century, economists have predicted the demise of the small farm, which they label "backward, unproductive and inefficient". But in fact, far from being stuck in the past, small-farm agriculture provides a productive, efficient and ecological vision for the future. By Peter Rosset

Today's ongoing process of liberalisation in international agricultural trade - taken a step further in the WTO Millennium Round last month in Seattle - Is having dramatically negative effects on small farmers everywhere. If small farms are worth preserving, then now is the time to educate the world's economists and policy - Makers about why we should do so. But are small farms worth preserving ? Can they possibly compete with large farms ? What are their benefits, in economic and ecological terms ?

The Arguments for Small Farms
In arguing the case for the continuation - indeed, for a resurgence - of small farms, it is important to note three key points. The first point is that, though small farmers have been driven out of rural areas across the world in their millions over the last five decades, they still persist. In many areas, such as the US, they continue to be numerically dominant. In the 'Third World', they are central to the production of staple foods. The predications of their demise continue to be premature.

The second point is that small farms are from being as unproductive or inefficient as many economists would have us believe. In fact - crucially - there is ample evidence that a small-farm model of agricultural development can produce far more food than a large-farm pattern ever could.

The third point is that small farms have multiple functions which benefit both society and the biosphere, and go far beyond the production of a particular commodity. These should be seriously valued and considered before we blithely accept yet another round of anti-small-farm policy measures handed down by the WTO and its client governments.

Small-Farm Virtues in the USA
Perhaps surprisingly, the US government - one of the most committed to liberalisation and corporate agriculture in the world - agrees with my analysis of the virtues of small farms. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National commission on Small Farms released a landmark report in 1998 entitled A Time to Act.2 What the USDA calls the "public value of small farms" in this report includes:

* Diversity : Small farms embody a diversity of ownership, of cropping systems, of landscapes, of biological organisation, culture and traditions. A varied farm structure contributes to biodiversity, a diverse and aesthetically-pleasing rural land-scape, and open space.

* Environmental benefits: Responsible management of the natural resources of soil, water and wildlife on the 60 per cent of all US farms less than 180 acres in size, produces significant environmental benefits.

* Empowerment and community responsibility: Decentralised land-ownership produces more-equitable economic opportunity for people in rural areas. This can provide a greater sense of personal responsibility and feeling of control over one's life. Landowners who rely on local businesses and services for their the community and its citizens.

* Personal Connection to Food: Most consumers have little connection to agriculture and, as a consequence, they have little connection with nature, and lack an appreciation of the farmer's role. Through farmers' markets and community-supported agriculture, consumers can connect with the people growing their food.

* Economic foundations: In various states and regions of the US, small farms are vital to the economy.

Small-Farm Virtues in the Third World
A similar pattern holds in the Third World, where policies promoting large farm, export-orientated agriculture have increasingly eroded the viability of small farms.

In traditional farming communities, the family farm is central to the sustainability of agricultural production. On the small farm, productive activities, labour mobilisation, consumption patterns, ecological knowledge and common interests in long-term maintenance of the farm as a resource, contribute to a stable and lasting economic enterprise. Short-term gain at the risk of degrading essential resources places both the family and the farm at risk of collapse. Family farmers regularly achieve higher and more dependable production from their land than large farms operating in similar environments. Labour-intensive practices such as manuring, limited tillage, ridging, terracing, composting organic matter and recycling plant products into the productive process enhance soil conservation and fertility.3

Small farmers have developed, sometimes over the course of 5,000 years, a variety of unique technologies, crops and farming systems. Perhaps most important in an era of diminishing non-renewable resources, small farmers across the Third World produce bountiful harvests with minimal recourse to expensive external inputs such as pesticides, machines or genetically modified seeds.4

Small-Farm Productivity
How many times have we been told by 'experts' that large farms are more productive than small farms? Or that they are more efficient? Yet the actual data, when examined, shows exactly the reverse for productivity : that smaller farms produce far more per unit area than large farms. So why is the establishment crusade against small farmers continuing ? One reason is that, because the conventional method of measuring 'productivity' is flawed, we are receiving the wrong answers to our questions.

* Resource use: large farms are less committed to management of other resources - such as forest and aquatic resources - which combine with the land to produce a greater quantity and better quality of production.

Small-Farm Efficiency
While small farms, then, are clearly more productive than large farms in terms of output, claims are often made that large farms are still more efficient. But this claim, too, is misleading.

Small Farms in Economic Development
Surely more bushels of gain is not the only goal of farm production; farm resources must also generate wealth for the overall improvement of rural life - including better housing, education, health services, diversification, and more recreational and cultural opportunities.

In the US, the crucial question was asked more than half a century ago: what does the growth of large-scale, industrial agriculture mean for rural towns and communities? Walter Goldschmidt's classic 1940s study of California's San Joaquin Valley compared areas dominated by large corporate farms with those still characterised by smaller family farms.9

In farming communities dominated by large corporate farms, Goldschmidt found, nearby towns died off. Mechanisation meant that fewer local people were employed, and absentee ownership meant that farm families themselves were no longer to be found. In these corporate-farm towns, the income earned in agriculture was drained off into larger cities to support distant enterprises, while in towns surrounded by family farms, the income circulated among the local business establishments, generating jobs and community prosperity. Where family farms predominated, there were more local businesses, paved streets and sidewalks, schools, parks, churches, clubs and newspapers, better services, higher employment and more civic participation. Studies conducted since Goldschmidt's original work confirm that his findings remain true today."

Back | Top
Media Spin and Israeli Occupation - By Norman Solomon mediabeat@igc.org

The formula for American (and British, Ed.) media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is simple: Report on the latest developments in the fragile "peace process." Depict U.S. officials as honest brokers in the negotiations. Emphasize the need for restraint and compromise instead of instability and bloodshed.

...Secretary of State Madeleine Albright proclaimed: "The cycle of violence has to be stopped." Such pronouncements from Washington get a lot of respectful media play in our country. Rarely do American journalists explore the ample reasons to believe that the United States is part of the oft-decried cycle of violence. Nor, in the past couple of weeks, has there been much media analysis of the fact that the violence was overwhelmingly inflicted on Palestinian people.

Within days, several dozen Palestinians, were killed by heavily armed men in uniform -- often described by CNN and other news outlets as :Israeli security forces." Under the circumstances, it's a notably benign-sounding term for an army that shoots down protesters.

As for the rock-throwing Palestinians, I have never seen or heard a single American news account describing them as "pro-democracy demonstrators." Yet that would be an appropriate way to refer to people who-- after more than three decades of living under occupation--are in the streets to demand self-determination.

While Israeli soldiers and police, with their vastly superior firepower, do most of the killing, Israel's public-relations engines keep whirling like well-oiled tops... Beneath the Israeli "peace process" rhetoric echoed by American media, an implicit message isn't hard to discern: If only Palestinians would resisting the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, it would no longer be necessary for Israeli forces to shoot them.

"Israel Extends Time For Peace," said the lead headline on the Oct.10 front page of USA Today. "Israel early today extended a deadline for Palestinians to end rioting, "the article began. At this rate, we may someday see a headline that reads: "Israel Demands Palestinians Stop Attacking Bullets With Their Bodies."

Of course, amid all the nifty Orwellian touches, the proper behavior of people whose homeland remains under occupation has never quite been spelled out. But U.S. media coverage has reflexively mimicked the themes coming out of the White House and State Department. It all makes sense -- as long as we set aside basic concepts of human rights -- as long as we refuse to acknowledge that without justice there can be no real peace.

For American journalists on mainstream career ladders, it's prudent to avoid making a big deal about Israel's human rights violations, which persist without letup in tandem with Israel's occupation of land it captured in the 1967 war. Many pundits are fond of cloaking the occupiers in mantles of righteousness. And we hear few questions raised about the fact that the occupiers enjoy the powerful backing of the United States.

The silence is usually deafening, even among journalists who write opinion columns on a regular basis. The U.S. government's economic and Military assistance to Israel add up to few billion dollars per year. Among media professionals, that aid is widely seen as an untouchable "third rail." To challenge U.S. support for Israel is to invite a torrent of denunciations -- first and foremost, the accusation of "anti-Semitism."

Occasionally, I've written columns criticizing U.S. media for strong pro-Israel bias in news reporting and spectrums of commentary. Every time, I can count on a flurry of angry letters that accuse me of being anti-Semitic. It's timeworn, knee-jerk tactic : Whenever someone makes a coherent critique of Israel's policies, immediately go on the attack with charges of anti-Jewish bigotry...

Like quite a few other Jewish Americans, I'm appalled by what Israel is doing with U.S. tax dollars. Meanwhile, as journalists go along to get along, they diminish the humanity of us all.

"Ask not for whom the bell tolls."

Back | Top
Victims of the Nuclear Age

Up to 1,300 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since its inception. The industry's figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power, in an attempt to hide its victims from the world. Here, the author calculates the real number of victims of the nuclear age. By Dr. Rosalie Bertell

On the tenth anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, I was standing at a public meeting in kiev, Ukraine, listening to the story of one of the firemen employed to clean up the site after the explosion. These workers took huge doses of radiation during this task, and their story is a terrifying one. About 600,000 men were conscripted as Chernobyl 'liquidators' (also called 'bio-robots'): farmers, factory workers, miners and soldiers -as well as professionals like the firemen - from all across Russia. Some of these men lifted pieces of radioactive metal with their bare hands. They had to fight more than 300 fires created by the chunks of burning material spewed off by the inferno. They buried trucks, fire engines, cars and all sorts of personal belongings. They felled a forest and completely buried it, removed topsoil, bulldozed houses and filled all available clay-lined trenches with radioactive debris. The minimum conscription time was 180 days, but many stayed for a year. Some were threatened with severe punishment to their families if they failed to stay and do their duty.

These 'liquidators' are now discarded and forgotten, many vainly trying to establish that the ill-health most have suffered ever since 1986 is a result of their massive exposure to radiation. At the Centre for Radiation Research outside Kiev, there is an organisation of former liquidators. This group reports that by 1995, 13,000 of their members had died - almost 20 percent of which deaths were suicides. About 70,000 members were estimated to be permanently disabled. But the members of this organisation are the lucky ones. Because many former liquidators are now scattered throughout Russia, they neither have the benefit of the organisation's special hospital, nor of membership of a survivor organisation. They are known as the 'living dead'.

The fireman whose story I was listening to seemed to be an exception to this grim litany of illness and death. He was telling the meeting how pleased and excited he was that, for the first time in ten years, his blood test findings were in the normal range. I was standing next to a delegate from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) - the organisation charged with promoting the use of atomic energy. On hearing the fireman's story, he leaned over to me and said: "You see! We said these were only transient disorders." A rough translation might read: Chernobyl? What's the problem?

The Real Victims
Despite the authorities' attempt at concealment, we can still begin to enumerate the real victims of the nuclear age. Although the calculations and statistics which I have brought to bear below do not include all of the human suffering that has been caused by the nuclear age, a closer look will show that the methodology for a first estimate of major damage. The magnitude of the harm already caused is startling, and even more so when we realise many types of damage have been omitted from this first estimate.

In my estimate cancer, whether fatal or non-fatal (excluding non-fatal skin cancer), genetic damage and serious congenital malformations and diseases will be included in the figures. Other damage is acknowledged but not estimated. Ultimately, whether or not one cares about the damage caused by radiation exposure is ultimately a human, not a scientific, question. Damage is damage, and causing an unwanted attack on someone's person or reproductive capacity is a violation of human rights. Such damage can be rated for importance, but it should not be arbitrarily ignored. 

"Statistics are the people with the tears wiped away" stated one of the Rongelap people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, who 'hosted' the United States' Bikini nuclear testing in the 1950s. This is the story of many tears, and of a hard-hearted mindset that laid down the degree of suffering and illhealth that would be the 'acceptable' price to pay for the world 'benefiting' from nuclear technology.

Risk Estimates used in this Analysis
In order to estimate the real victims of the nuclear industry (as opposed to those figures enumerated by the ICRP, IAEA and other nuclear apologists) I will take the customary risk estimates, indicate their probable range of error, and then extend the definition to cover related events not recognised as 'detriments' by the regulators. For example, while the nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration. And limiting genetic effects to live-born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth.

According to the BBC TV programme Here and Now, the 'World's Greatest Liar' competition is held annually in West Cumbria. Pubs are satirically re-named The Pork Pie, The Tall Story etc. In 1997, appropriately, the second prize went to a BNFL employee.

Since the 1950s, the nuclear and military establishments and their friends in the radiation risk agencies, have involved themselves in lies, cover-ups, whitewash, disinformation and plain skullduggery. Their employment a brief to deny everything - regardless of the consequences. But routine admissions, harvested during the regular enquiries and court cases which occur at places like Sellafield, paint a crude picture.

The most interesting question is how the human race has been systematically poisoned for half a century by cancer-producing radioisotopes released from every nuclear site in the world without the medical establishment cottoning on. To understand the answer to this, we must first look at science in the 20th century and how scientific belief is established and maintained.

Back | Top

International News

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Online Catalogue : International News

Email this page to a friend or colleague

www.abaan.com


Home Catalog Info Search View Cart Checkout Send Mail

Buy Online - Be Smart, Elegant and Unique... Buy Abaan

Ladies fashion - clothing - apparel - designers manufacture - wholesale & retail. factory prices - catalogs - shopping e-commerce... Ladies lingerie - ladies leather jackets -ladies bags.. Jewellery gold, diamond & precious stones. Jewellery fantasy & costume..Organic cosmetics-organic health shop-organic bath products..Dr Bach flowers. Organic & biodynamic foods-organic supermarket-organic&biodynamic wines-organic & biodynamic coffee & tea. Organic baby foods... Gifts - flowers-free greeting cards & e-cards. Free health tips & Alternative Therapies. Free horoscope free news - free jokes & proverbs.

Charity - children's charity - world hunger.. Web design - website design.